Exploring Educational Management Through Inductive Analysis Addressing Fallacies in Qualitative Research Methodologies

Main Article Content

Nuriman Nuriman
Yusnaini
Setiawan

Abstract

This research investigates the challenges faced by students in completing academic reports, particularly in anthropology, sociology, and education. Despite the growing importance of quality academic writing, students often struggle with proper documentation, leading to incomplete or inaccurate reports. A key gap identified is the lack of a systematic approach to understanding these issues, especially in the context of methodological challenges in academic reporting. The study employs a qualitative method with an inductive approach, utilizing documentation techniques and content analysis. Data was collected from various sources, including published and unpublished academic documents such as theses, dissertations, research papers, and books. Triangulation through peer discussions and document analysis ensured the reliability and validity of the findings. The research identifies common issues in academic reporting, including difficulties in structuring research and presenting findings clearly. It also highlights the role of proper documentation in enhancing the quality of academic work. The study recommends that academic institutions implement structured writing workshops and emphasize proper documentation techniques. Additionally, students should be trained in effective research methodologies and document handling. This research has significant implications for improving academic writing practices and methodologies in higher education, ultimately enhancing the quality of scholarly work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nuriman, N., Yusnaini, & Setiawan. (2024). Exploring Educational Management Through Inductive Analysis : Addressing Fallacies in Qualitative Research Methodologies. ABANNA: Journal Of Contemporary Islamic Education, 2(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.71036/ajcie.v2i2.342
Section
Articles

References

Barroga, Edward, and Hiroshi Mitoma. “Improving Scientific Writing Skills and Publishing Capacity by Developing University-Based Editing System and Writing Programs.” Journal of Korean Medical Science 34, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e9.

Carranza Hernández, Karina Milena, Máryury Salazar Leyva, and Marcos de Jesús Hinojosa Hernández. “Educational Management from the Integrated Input-Output Methodology of the Dynamic Model.” Revista Venezolana de Gerencia 28, no. 102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.102.24.

Carrasco, Cecilia Alejandra Marambio. “An Experience in Educational Management: A Dynamic Action for Cultural Transformation.” Educar, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.809.

Carter, Nancy, Denise Bryant-Lukosius, Alba Dicenso, Jennifer Blythe, and Alan J. Neville. “The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research.” Oncology Nursing Forum, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.

Fletcher, Colin. “The Practice of Qualitative Research.” In Beneath the Surface, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003459927-9.

Guion, Lisa A., David C. Diehl, and Debra McDonald. “Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies.” EDIS 2011, no. 8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fy394-2011.

Korstjens, Irene, and Albine Moser. “Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research. Part 2: Context, Research Questions and Designs.” European Journal of General Practice 23, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.

Lathlean, Judith, Pam Denicolo, and Pam Denicolo. Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Qualitative Data. Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Qualitative Data, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071885628.

Lopez, Ruth Palan, Ellen P. McCarthy, Kathleen M. Mazor, Meghan Hendricksen, Susan McLennon, Kimberly S. Johnson, and Susan L. Mitchell. “ADVANCE: Methodology of a Qualitative Study.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 69, no. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17217.

McMillian, J., and S Schumacher. “Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction (4th Edition). .” Pearson Education Limited, 1997.

Milasari, Milasari, Ahmad Syukri, Badarussyamsi Badarussyamsi, and Ahmad Fadhil Rizki. “Filsafat Ilmu Dan Pengembangan Metode Ilmiah.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 4, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.35499.

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. Qualittaive Data Analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. Vol. 6, 2014.

Peel, Karen L. “Beginner’s Guide to Applied Educational Research Using Thematic Analysis.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 25, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7275/ryr5-k983.

Pope, C, and N Mays. “What Are Qualitative Methods?” Bmj 311, no. 1 (1995).

Priest, Helena, Paula Roberts, and Leslie Woods. “An Overview of Three Different Approaches to the Interpretation of Qualitative Data. Part 1: Theoretical Issues.” Nurse Researcher, 2002. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2002.10.10.1.30.c5877.

Sulistiyarini, Ambar, Sukarno, and Triyanto. “Pre-Lesson Reading Activities on Creative Thinking Skills: Implementation, Impact, and Constraints.” Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi 12, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.10.

Ulrich, Theresa A. “Qualitative Studies and Textual Document Research in the United States: Conducting Research in National Archives.” Qualitative Report 25, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4173.